Penn State Meets Scholarship Reduction Early

Penn State received many penalties from the NCAA last summer. The three penalties that affect Penn State’s on-field performance each run for four years. But all three cover a different four years:

  • Postseason Ban: 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16
  • Initial Counter Limit (15): 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17
  • Overall Counter Limit (65): 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18

Penn State is on track to meet the last of those penalties, the limit of only 65 overall counters, a year ahead of schedule:

“This is really a six-year sanction,” O’Brien said. “We have until 2014 to get down to 65 scholarships. We’re at 65 in 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017, and we’re already at 65, probably, in August of 2013. So it’s not just a four-year sanction.”

The sixth year O’Brien is talking about is 2018-19, when it will be virtually impossible for Penn State to get all the way back to 85 scholarships, although tricks like blueshirting and scholarships given to junior walk-ons can help.

Penn State being at 65 scholarships for 2013-14 raises a valid question: why is the school not allowed to start the sanction early? Scholarship sanctions are routinely delayed when a school has already committed itself to more scholarships than the sanctions would allow. In Penn State’s case, the NCAA built in a delay to allow the school to get down to the reduced number.

Penn State did not need the delay. The NCAA should allow PSU to move its overall counter sanction up by a year, ending now with the 2016-17 academic year. This is even more appropriate given the additional elements of the sanctions which contributed to the attrition, like allowing transfers with no penalty or restriction and letting athletes quit the team but keep their scholarships.

Otherwise the penalty, supposedly a four-year reduction, appears intended to be what O’Brien says they are: a six-year reduction. And that gives credence to the claim that the NCAA simply took a convenient opportunity to hammer a successful program as hard as possible.

Posted on by John Infante
This entry was posted in Bylaw Blog, Headlines, NCAA Penalties. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Penn State Meets Scholarship Reduction Early

  1. Anonymous says:

    Not even close to “as hard as possible.” They could have levied TV bans, additional post-season bans, or shut down play entirely. Cry me a river for Penn State and their horrible, atrocious activities.

    • Anonymous says:

      However atrocious the activities may have been not one of them resulted in an NCAA violation. The consent degree between the NCAA and Penn State even states this. The NCAA was reckless, did not wait for due process and did not even follow their OWN processes. Any sanctions in place are a sham.

    • Anonymous says:

      Anonymous, Please name Penn State’s horrible, atrocious activities.

    • Anonymous says:

      Truely the NCAA could have hammered Penn State more but I still can’t understand the resoning for the punishment against the football team in the first place. What NCAA regulations did the football team break?

  2. Anonymous says:

    Yes, I would kind of like to hear what Penn State’s horrible atrocious activities were myself.

  3. Anonymous says:

    And all these penalties, sanctions, fines, etc without ever breaking one NCAA rule. Unreal injustice.

  4. Anonymous says:

    And all this without ever breaking one NCAA rule…to this day PSU and Stanford are the only two schools never to have a major violation in any sport let alone football. What a travesty when you sit back and think about what the NCAA did to Penn State

  5. Anonymous says:

    Penn State is by far one of the best Universities in the Country.

  6. Anonymous says:

    Why can’t someone stand up to Emerett? PSU got hosed.

Leave a Comment