NCAA Sues PA on Constitutional Grounds

The NCAA fired back at the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, which is already suing the NCAA to have the Penn State sanctions overturned, with a lawsuit that challenges a proposed law in Pennsylvania which would require the NCAA to spend PSU’s $60 million fine in the state:

The actions, the lawsuit said, would disrupt interstate commerce by attempting to legislate where private parties like the NCAA spend their money and by confiscating funds intended for the victims of child sexual abuse nationwide to be used solely for the benefit of Pennsylvania residents, at the direction of Pennsylvania officials.

The constitutional principle here is something called the Dormant Commerce Clause. The Commerce Clause of the Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce. The Dormant Commerce Clause is the implied corrallary to that principle: that a state may not interfere with, unduly burden, or discriminate against interstate commerce.

The Dormant Commerce Clause is the source of one of the NCAA’s most important but least talked about legal victories, NCAA v. Miller. That case arose out of the Tarkanian scandal, after which the state of Nevada passed laws which would have forced the NCAA to raise due process protections when dealing with Nevada schools, coaches, administrators and athletes (and thus probably everyone else under the NCAA auspices). The NCAA challenged the case using the Dormant Commerce Clause and won in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

NCAA v. Miller (although not a Supreme Court case) protects the NCAA from being torn about by state legislatures. As a result of that case, a state may not pass a rule allowing athletes to be paid or requiring schools to ignore the NCAA academic eligibility rules. In effect, it limits what type of state regulation the NCAA can come under, to only things consistent with NCAA regulations. An example are student-athlete rights bills which normally require schools to do things which the NCAA already allows.

Now with suit and countersuit pending, the NCAA and Pennsylvania can get down to settling the case. But if they do not, expect the NCAA to fight viciously in their case to defend and even expand one of their most important legal precedents.

Posted on by John Infante
This entry was posted in Bylaw Blog, Headlines, NCAA Penalties. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to NCAA Sues PA on Constitutional Grounds

  1. Aaron says:

    “The actions, the lawsuit said, would disrupt interstate commerce by attempting to legislate where private parties like the NCAA spend their money”

    Their money? That is not their money.

  2. Tallygal says:

    The NCAA says it cares about the abused kids. They all were Pennsylvania kids. Does the NCAA want to earn interest off the fine money before dispersing where it pleases?

  3. Jim says:

    What the NCAA is saying is that as an interstate concern, the PA legislature cannot dictate how their university complies with NCAA by laws, including abiding by sanctions levied against the university. The state does have another option–withdraw from the NCAA. Otherwise, the PA government, along with many PSU fans, needs to (1) quit whining, (2) acknowledge that a university covering up child rape to protect a sports program is unconscionable, and (3) suck it up and take the punishment. I have no doubt the NCAA will win this battle.

  4. LionInTheMidwest says:

    Other than the court of public opinion, no one at Penn State has been convicted of anything. I’m personally waiting for the outcome of the Curly, Schultz and Spanier trails. I don’t think the State has a case. Then what?

    I’m sure in your world Jim, they’re guilty anyway.

Leave a Comment