Miami Allegations Coming Into Focus

As a private institution not subject to open records laws, details about the NCAA case against Miami will not be a matter of public record as quickly and as easily as in other recent cases. With no legal obligation to release the Notice of Allegations and Miami not intending to any time soon, we are left with waiting for leaks and reading between the lines on the available information.

The Associated Press is reporting that the NCAA is alleging that Nevin Shaprio provided $170,000 in impermissible benefits to student-athletes, recruits, and their families. Compare that with what Shapiro told Miami:

The figures that the NCAA’s enforcement staff cited in the notice of allegations add up to a significantly lower total than what Shapiro told Yahoo Sports in 2011, when he estimated his extra-benefit spending spree as going into the “millions of dollars.”

That should not be surprising at this point. When the NCAA started its work corroborating Shaprio’s accusations, it was always more likely that they would have less in the case, rather than more. The enforcement staff’s misconduct in the case also likely affected some of the bigger accusations, given what appears to be missing from some of the coaches’ notices.

While the total value of the benefits is lower, the number of involved individuals is even higher. Yahoo! found 72 athletes involved, while the NCAA had 72 current (at the time) student-athletes, three recruits, and 12 friends and family members of athletes. So in total the case looks like it includes almost 90 individuals, $170,000 in benefits, multiple unethical conduct charges, failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance for a former head coach and a lack of institutional control charge for the university.

Another important detail from the AP report is that the majority of the benefits, $90,000, were spent by Shapiro on two athletes he was trying to recruit to his fledgling sports agency. Rather than recruiting violations, these are more akin to the amateurism violations involved in the Reggie Bush case. A huge chunk of the case is better framed as more akin to Southern California rather than this generation’s Southern Methodist.

Posted on by John Infante
This entry was posted in Bylaw Blog, Headlines, NCAA Violations. Bookmark the permalink.
Join the #1 RECRUITING NETWORK

3 Responses to Miami Allegations Coming Into Focus

  1. 4EVERTROJAN says:

    I take exception to the final paragraph, and particularly the final two sentences. In the USC case, who was the Trojan’s equivalent to Nathan Shapiro? To allege that two punk criminals in San Diego equal, in their attempt to lure Reggie Bush AWAY from the University, the antics of Shapiro is ludicrous.

  2. DW says:

    Obviously the big difference between this and the USC case is that Shapiro was extremely and obviously connected to UM. The wannabe agents in SD weren’t boosters.

  3. The_Truth_Is_Out_There says:

    Agree with the two other comments regarding a significant and obvious difference between the association of USC with the two want-a-be agents in the Bush case and Nevin Shapiro, a large UM donor at the time, who led the football team onto the field for games at least twice. And, of course, from all reasonable perspectives, this makes Miami look more intertwined into the wrongdoing and on notice to at least take heighten precautions. Given that and we’re talking about the NCAA and the University of its past COI Chair, Paul Dee, I’m sure the Miami penalties will be nothing compared to the USC penalties. And, John, you can just put another notch in your “outlier” theory regarding the USC case – which I would call blatant evidence of NCAA corruption at its height.

Leave a Comment